Literature Journal

Hi Ryan,

Could you please add to this journal, these are things I would like added.

1) In the literature review add two journals that are about how boys learn differently etc

2) Add to the problem. In this area could you add more detail as to what the problem is in Australia about boys being more disengaged with literacy than girls etc..

3) Please just go over and make the writing more persuasive on that mindfulness could improvement boys engagement of literacy learning

4) Please ensure all references are in Harvard

4) Then please just tidy up the editing

Thank you.

Write an Email

Learn and Teach

In this task, you will learn about this subject and then teach it to a friend.

Question:

What is the six strikes policy? Has it worked? What would you do to address the issue of illegal downloads?

  1. Read the prompt carefully and research an answer
  2. Try explaining the concept verbally to someone to see if your explanation is clear
  3. Write an explanation of the concept as if it were an email to a friend
  4. Cover all the questions asked in the prompt. Your best bet is to start a paragraph for each part of the prompt and lead with what that part of the prompt asks.
  5. Write at least 300 words
  6. Include at least two sources (one that is not Wikipedia) at the end of the email. A URL and title is all that is needed for the source.

Teacher Perception of Leadership

After reading the assigned chapters and articles, your next task is to conduct a literature review on five research articles related to teacher perceptions of leaders. At least one of the five articles must be related to supervisory behaviors. In your assignment be sure to explore the following in your review:

  • Theoretical framework
  • Research methods
  • Research results for each article
  • Synthesize the findings and make recommendations for practice

Length: 5-7 pages, not including the title and reference pages

References: A minimum of five scholarly references, at least one of which must relate to supervisory behaviors, published within the last five years, to support your assertions.

CRJ462 ASU Criminal Justice Gang Membership Research Paper

As you answer this question, please consider and account for the following:

Does it matter if they live in an area where there is a lot of gang activity? What do the statistics say and what do the anecdotal experiences you have seen in the course say? To those who feel there is not a choice, how do you explain that the percentage of people who get involved in gangs in areas where there is significant gang activity is actually lower than the percentage of people who do not get involved in gangs? Isn’t that proof that people are not a product of their environment? To those who feel there is a choice, how do you explain that there are higher percentages of people involved in gangs in areas where there is more gang activity? Isn’t that proof that people are a product of their environment?

Students are expected to participate in the Discussion Board in each module. Each student should make two posts, one in response to the posted discussion board topic and one in response to other posts. The original post should comprise the majority of your writing in the discussion board. The combined posts should equal at least 1 full page of writing. Posts are to be respectful, express an opinion based on the course material, and be relevant to the question posted for the discussion board.

Meaningful and substantive contributions will require that you carefully read (and reflect on) the prompt and related course material, and that you pose a stance that you support with cited evidence from course material and/or other credible sources. APA guidelines apply. Avoid relying on unsupported opinions or personal anecdotes as the sole support for your arguments. It is helpful and engaging to include personal experiences and opinions, but these things alone will not satisfy the requirements for discussion boards in this course.

Describe Internal, External, Construct, and Conclusion Validity

Describe internal, external, construct, and conclusion validity in THREE SENTENCES OR LESS each. Then, in three sentences or less, describe the difference(s) between validity and reliability. Finally, juxtapose the different types of research design covered in the module.

1. respond to the following statement with a reference:

Internal Validity – is the degree to a point to where you can’t give or take that on no additional account variables excluding the one, and you’re learning it instigated the consequence.

External Validity – is the level to which the consequences of a study can be generalized to the world at large. Is the thought that there assume causal link can be concluded such a way that’s alternate to cause and effect.

Conclusion Validity – is basically whether that relationship is a sensible one or not, given the information. .

Construction Validity – alludes to the degree to which operationalization of a build (i.e., viable tests created from a hypothesis) do quantify what the theory says they do.

Reliability – The regularity of an assessment.

Validity – The firmness of your outcome.

Non-experimental research- is the name given to a study when an analyst can’t control, control, or modify the indicator variable or subjects

Quasi-experimental – Distinguish an examination bunch that is as comparative as could be expected under the circumstances to the treatment bunch as far as gauge (pre -intercession) attributes.

True experimental – Empirical research is the point at which a scientist can control the indicator variable and subjects to recognize circumstances and results from relationship.

References:

1. Trochim, W. (2006). Research Methods Knowledge Base. Designs. Retrieved May 28, 2019, from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/design.php

2. Trochim, W. (2006). Research Methods Knowledge Base. Types of Designs. Retrieved May 28, 2019, from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/destypes.p…

2. Respond to the statement with a reference:

Internal validity

According to Trochim (2006) internal validity is only applicable in causal studies. Internal validity is how much confidence the researcher has that the independent variable is responsible for the changes to the outcome variable.

External validity

External validity is the process of being able to generalize the research results of a study to the entire population.

Construct validity

Construct validity is one way to examine how well a test is calculating what it is supposed to calculate.

Conclusion validity

Trochim (2006) defines conclusion validity as how practical are the assumptions reached about the data relationships. Basically, conclusion validity equates to the credibility or believability of the research.

Validity versus reliability

Validity refers to the accuracy of a test where reliability refers to the consistency of a test or measure. The two terms are not exclusive, they are independent of each other, as you can have one without having the other.

Compare and contrast research designs

Non-experimental research is often descriptive in nature as there are no control groups, random assignments, or manipulated variables. Non-experimental uses interpretation, observation, or interaction to form a conclusion.

Quasi-experimental, and true experimental research designs both involve manipulation of the independent variable but differ in that true experimental research utilizes random assignment into the control and experimental groups.

References

Trochim, W. (2006). Research methods knowledge base. Retrieved 27 May 2019, from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/resques.php

3: Respond to statement with a reference

Internal Validity

Internal validity is a way to measure if research is sound. In other words, was the research done right? Internal validity refers to how well a piece of research allows you to choose amongst alternative explanations. (Trochim, 2006) states that internal validity is ultimately used in causal studies.

External Validity

External validity refers to how well statistics and theories from one setting apply to another. In other words, does the same thing that occurs in one setting take place in another. (Anderson and Bushman, 1997) suggests that “laboratory studies” and “real world” studies have the same process.

Construct Validity

Construct validity is the extent to which what is being measured performs in a way that is coherent with the theoretical hypothesis. That is, how well a test is measuring what is supposed to be measured.

Conclusion Validity

This type of validity specifies what type of relationship exists, and how believable it is. Essentially, how dependable or reasonable the research is.

Validity versus Reliability

Outside of statistical research, validity and reliability are used exchangeable. However, validity simply refers to how well a test or instrument is accurately measuring what it’s supposed to. Whereas, reliability refers to the stability or consistency of a test or measurement.

Compare and Contrast Research Designs

A true experimental design offers the most control over variables allowing researchers to manipulate the independent variable (IV). Therefore, is the best option to exploring causal relationships between independent and dependent variables. There are (3) main characteristics true experiments must have. (1) The research must involve random assignment of groups or conditions. (2) In the research the scientists must have control over manipulation of the independent variable. (3) There must be some control group or condition. Whereas, Quasi- experimental designs are characterized by no random assignment of participants or groups. They may lack a control group as well as manipulation over the independent variable. Non- experimental designs however, is defined as lacking all (3) characteristics of true experiments. This type of experiment lacks random assignment of participants, control over manipulation of the independent variable, and the presence of a control group or condition. In some cases, the non-experimental designs will have a control group, but lack the other two characteristics. A common type of non- experimental design is correlational studies. Which uses interpretation, observation, and interaction, in order to form a conclusion.

Reference(s)

  1. Bhattacherjee A. Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices. 2 nd ed. Open Access Textbooks; 2012.
  2. Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: Theory and application. Am J Med 2006; 119:166. e7-16.
  3. Trident University International. (2019). Research validity and research designs: Home. (p.1).RetrievedonMay312019from https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/le/content/120417/viewContent/3035043/View?ou=120417
  4. Trochim W. (2006). Research methods knowledge base. Types of designs. Retrieved May 31, 2019 from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/destypes.php



ENG 1101 GSU Tell-tale Heart And The Black Cat Evaluation Essay

Nick Pincumbe

EN 1101 Evaluation Paper Packet

Your assignment, if you choose to accept it (and you’d better, it’s worth 10% of your grade!) is to choose one literary short story reading from this course (the full list of options will be discussed in class) and write a fully fleshed out Evaluation paper (4G) on one of the following topics:

  1. What is the dominant theme of this piece? How do you know this theme exists? What does the literary piece say about that theme and how is it expressed in the piece?
  2. What was one major symbol used in your chosen piece? What was the significance of this symbol in understanding the overall meaning of the piece? How was this expressed in the piece?
  3. What was the major conflict in your chosen piece? Was it external (character vs. the world) or internal (character vs. themselves)? How did encountering this conflict change the protagonist over the length of the piece?

Construct a clear argument answering these questions for one of the topics and use specific textual evidence from the story to support and develop your stance. Your essay should contain a thesis statement that gives me an idea of how you will back this point up and how your support will be organized throughout. It should also fulfill the other requirements of your rubric.

This paper should include significant textual evidence (properly documented quotes or paraphrases from your chosen reading) to support your thesis. In addition, since we are part of a larger conversation about literary analysis, the use of credible, properly documented, academic literary criticism is welcomed and encouraged.

1200 words (two pages double spaced 12 point font). Please include your name, a title, the date, and your class hour at the top, as well as page numbers throughout.

Nick Pincumbe

EN 1101 Evaluation Paper

Assignment 4A: Pre-Writing

Your first assignment in the creation of your Evaluation Paper (4G) is to do a Pre-Writing exercise (4A). For this exercise you can choose one type of Pre-Writing, such as:

Asking questions

Listing

Brainstorming

Freewriting

Clustering

Bubbling

Informal Outlining

At the top of the first page of your assignment, list the type of Pre-Writing you chose to use from this list.

Choose an appropriate topic for the Evaluation paper (sample topics listed on the first page of this prompt) and write out one of the above Pre-Writing activities on that topic.

Your Pre-Writing activity should be at least one full page in length.

At the bottom of the last page of your assignment, write down a one sentence description of your narrowed topic for this paper.

If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to ask!

Nick Pincumbe

EN 1101 Evaluation Paper

Assignment 4B: Annotated Bibliography

Your second assignment in the creation of your Evaluation Paper (4G) is to create your Annotated Bibliography (4B).

An annotated bibliography formalizes your research process. It forces us to spend a bit more time thinking about the sources we’re using, whether we can trust them, and how we are using them in our writing.

For this assignment, we are considering outside literary criticism as a means to complement our own analysis of texts. As such, you should take your questions and assumptions from the pre-writing exercise and challenge them by locating one or more sources of academic quality that provide insightful literary criticism on your chosen literary piece (noSparknotes, Cliffnotes, etc. will be accepted).

You will need to use credible library and/or Internet resources. Your annotated bibliography should include four distinct parts:

  1. A full citation of each source in MLA Style as it would appear on your Works Cited page (alphabetical order, hanging indentations, etc.).
  2. A short one paragraph summary below each source of the important information it contains.
  3. A thoughtful one paragraph explanation below each source of why you found this source to be credible.
  4. A short one paragraph explanation below each source of how you could use this source to develop your topic and support your thesis.

Other than the citation, each part of your Annotated Bibliography should consist of complete sentences. Make sure to visually distinguish each part of the assignment.

Your initial copy can be typed and printed or hand written and should be completed in class during our library day. In fact, it should be shared with me for my review before you will be dismissed on the day in question. A final version should be submitted electronically along with your other assignments when your final draft is due.

Sources can be electronic or print, but should be of academic quality (no .com, no wiki, no dictionaries or encyclopedias).

If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to ask!

Nick Pincumbe

EN 1101 Evaluation Paper

Assignment 4C: Thesis Statement

Your third assignment in the creation of your Evaluation Paper (4G) is to create your thesis statement (4C). For this exercise you should use this sheet as your guide and create a printed one page assignment that identifies your TOPIC, your STANCE on that topic, and three SUPPORT POINTS that you will use to back up that stance in your paper. Please include your name, date, etc., as you would on any other assignment and bring one hard copy to your Conference (see Course Schedule announcement for dates).

Thesis Statement Breakdown

  1. Topic:
  2. Stance:
  3. First support:
  4. Second support:
  5. Third support:

Sample Layout

Due to/Because of

1) (First Support Point)____________________________________________________,

2) (Second Support Point)__________________________________________________,

and

3) (Third Support Point)___________________________________________________,

4) (Topic and Stance)______________________________________________________.


If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to ask!

Nick Pincumbe

EN 1101 Evaluation Paper

Assignment 4D: Outline

Your fourth assignment in the creation of your Evaluation Paper (4G) is to take your thesis statement (4C) and expand it into an outline (4D). For this exercise you should use this handout as your guide and create a printed one-to-two page assignment that outlines a five paragraph structure for your essay based on an introduction, three support paragraphs, and a conclusion. Per our discussion in class, the three support points from your thesis should be the basis for your three support paragraphs.

Since you’ll be including source material for this paper, you can record key quotes or paraphrases (and their in-text citations) as examples where appropriate. Make sure to include your explanation or analysis of the source material you choose to use.

Please include your name, date, etc., as you would on any other assignment and bring one hard copy to your Conference (see Course Schedule announcement for dates).

See the next two pages for a helpful breakdown of how to assemble a complete outline. If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to ask!

Outline Breakdown

Introduction

Hook___________________________________________________________________

Background______________________________________________________________

Point 1) _________________________________________________________________

Point 2) _________________________________________________________________

Point 3) _________________________________________________________________

Thesis __________________________________________________________________

Support One

Topic Sentence ___________________________________________________________

Example or Citation 1a)____________________________________________________

Analysis/Explanation 1b)__________________________________________________

Example or Citation 2a)____________________________________________________

Analysis/Explanation 2b)__________________________________________________

Example or Citation 3a)____________________________________________________

Analysis/Explanation 3b)__________________________________________________

Explanation (relates back to thesis)____________________________________________

Transition _______________________________________________________________

Support Two

Topic Sentence ___________________________________________________________

Example or Citation 1a)____________________________________________________

Analysis/Explanation 1b)__________________________________________________

Example or Citation 2a)____________________________________________________

Analysis/Explanation 2b)__________________________________________________

Example or Citation 3a)____________________________________________________

Analysis/Explanation 3b)__________________________________________________

Explanation (relates back to thesis) ___________________________________________

Transition _______________________________________________________________

Support Three

Topic Sentence ___________________________________________________________

Example or Citation 1a)____________________________________________________

Analysis/Explanation 1b)__________________________________________________

Example or Citation 2a)____________________________________________________

Analysis/Explanation 2b)__________________________________________________

Example or Citation 3a)____________________________________________________

Analysis/Explanation 3b)__________________________________________________

Explanation (relates back to thesis) __________________________________________

Conclusion

Restated Thesis __________________________________________________________

Recap Point 1) ___________________________________________________________

Recap Point 2) ___________________________________________________________

Recap Point 3) ___________________________________________________________

Take Home _____________________________________________________________

Nick Pincumbe

EN 1101 Evaluation Paper

Assignment 4E: First Draft

Your fifth assignment in the creation of your Evaluation Paper (4G) is to take your outline (4D) and expand it into a full draft of your paper (4E). For this exercise you should use this handout as your guide and create a printed one-to-two page assignment that follows the five paragraph structure of your outline, but is fleshed out into complete sentences, and includes a clear introduction, support paragraphs, concrete examples, and a complete conclusion. Per our discussion in class, the three support points from your thesis should be the basis for your three support paragraphs. Please include your name, date, etc., as you would on any other assignment and bring three hard copies to workshop (see Course Schedule announcement for dates).

Remember, this paper should include significant textual evidence (properly documented quotes or paraphrases from your chosen reading) to support your thesis, as well as sufficient analysis and concrete examples. In addition, since we are part of a larger conversation about literary analysis, the use of (properly documented) outside literary criticism is welcomed and encouraged.

If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to ask!

EN 1101 Evaluation Paper

Assignment 4F: Revision Exercise Assignment 4G: Final Draft

Your sixth and seventh assignments in the creation of your Evaluation Paper (4G) are to take your first draft (4E), to do a revision exercise on it (4F), and then to fully revise and edit your first draft to create a final draft (4G) for submission in class.

4F: Revision and Editing Exercise

For this exercise you should review (look again) at your first draft and type full sentence answers to the following prompts:

  1. What part of your paper, if any, can use expansion and what specific information can you add there to make it stronger?
  2. What part of your paper, if any, gets off topic, and what can you remove to help?
  3. Is your organization strong? If so, what makes it strong? If not, or if it could use improvement still, what can you move or substitute to help? Consider creating a reverse outline to help.
  4. How credible are the sources you used? How do you know?
  5. Examine your paper’s tone. Is it too informal or conversational? If so, what can change?
  6. Do you have any word choice errors that spellcheck wouldn’t find?
  7. Do you have any coma-splice errors, run ons, or sentence fragments?
  8. Do you have any fluffy word choices?
  9. Are all of your sources properly documented in MLA style?
  10. What is one specific step you can take to improve your paper before submitting it?

Only one copy of Assignment 4F is needed. It should be submitted along with 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, and 4E when you turn in 4G.

4G: Final Draft

Complete your final draft of your Evaluation Paper by revising and editing your first draft (4D). Your final draft should present a compelling argument clearly stated in a complete thesis statement, include a complete introduction, at least three support paragraphs, and a complete conclusion, should be well-organized and supported, should include plenty of thoughtful analysis and concrete support details and should follow all of the expectations of the course rubric.

The final draft should be a two page assignment (Times New Roman 12 point font) and should include your name, date, etc., as you would on any other assignment.

Assignments 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E, and 4F should be submitted by the listed due date (see Course Schedule announcement). Make sure everything is clearly labelled and organized to put yourself in the best position for success!

Signs of Child Abuse Opportunities for Prevention & Intervention Discussion

no plagiarize, spell check, and check your grammar. Please only use the reference below. Ask at least one question in response to an original peer post that you would like the author to explore further.

Discussion

The two dysfunctional behaviors that can result from intergenerational abuse are emotional and physical abuse. Emotional abuse may be defined as experiencing a lack of love and emotional support from over significant individuals (Kaplan, Pelcovitz, & Labruna, 1999, p.1214). First, Rick’s father demonstrated emotional abuse toward him by failing to provide him with emotional support, calling him derogatory names, and humiliating him by stating to him that he would never amount to anything in life. His mother also caused emotional abuse to him through her actions. Her actions were to do nothing but allow the father to abuse him without intervening to protect him. In addition, being exposed to emotional abuse as a child had a negative effect on Rick’s relationship with his wife and child. Physical abuse may be defined as an act of physical violence which results in physical injury on another individual (Archana, Don,2019, p.189). Second, Rick was a victim of physical abuse by his father when he attempted to protect his mother from being physically abused by his father. In addition, growing up in this type of environment Rick inflicted physical abuse on his wife and son by slamming her against the wall and violently shaking his son.

As a human service professional, an intervention would need to be implemented for Rick to break the intergenerational abuse cycle. First, it needs to be explained to Rick that emotional and physical abuse are not appropriate behavior that needs to be displayed toward his wife and son. Second, an early prevention of maltreatment program is needed to help Rick to handle his emotional and physical abuse towards his wife and son. The early prevention of maltreatment program is designed to identify and prevent the abuse before it escalates to a level of emotional and physical abuse. This program may be designed to tailor the specific needs of a family (Fallon, Ma, Allan, Pillhofer, Trocme, & Jud, 2013, p.12). Third, a human service professional may help Rick with develop strategies designed to help Rick control his anger, physical and verbal aggression/abuse towards his wife and child. This program will be able to help Rick to express his anger, trust issues, and self-control. Last, Rick needs to attend counseling on marriage and parenting. This will help Rick to improve his relationship with his child, wife, mother, and father, thus, reducing the possibility of a continued cycle of abuse.

References

Archana, K., & Don, K.R. (2019). Physical signs of child abuse. Drug Invention Today, 11(1), 180-192. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/login.aspx (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.?

Fallon, B., Ma, J., Allan, K., Pillhofer, M., Trocme, N., & Jud, A. (2013). Opportunities for prevention and intervention with young children: Lessons from the Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect. Child & Adolescent Psychiatry & Mental Health, 7(1): 1-13.doi:10.1186/1753-2000-7-4

Annoted Assignment

find two websites that are related to your research question. For this assignment, you will use a search engine like Google, Bing, or Duck Duck Go, not the Ashford Library databases to find your sources. Finally, copy and paste the references and annotations for your two scholarly journal articles from week 3 into your paper. Topic Mandatory Drug Testing.

Professors notes from week 3 you did not, however, provide a research question for me to evaluate. Additionally, you were also missing a sufficient conclusion.

Outline for a Research Argument Essay (Draft outline is given and also the sample)

Hi, this assignment consists on create an outline based on the given sample. I am working on a research about Hate Speech and one of my prior assignments was to draft its outline. Now that I have a model, I need to structure it as the example. I am attaching 2 word docs, one with the detailed information which includes the sample and the draft outline that needs to be edit as the final outline and the 2nd is the essay about hate speech that actually includes the comments that my professor made on it. (I am not asking to do anything to the essay but reading it. so you can be in context with the topic.)

Instruction: Using the sample bellow as example, outline your own argument using sentence-level outline (every entry on the outline should be formulated as a complete sentence).

Requirements: it’s very important that the outline includes the following sections,

  • Intro
  • Claim
  • Reasoning
  • Refutation
  • Solution
  • Conclusion

Tip: Start the outline with the claim, continue to outline reasoning, and make sure to include refutation.